Top

More stimulus money is needed Default Thumbnail

November 5, 2009 by Afan Tarar 

More governmental intervention is needed to battle unemployment

I do not care who you are or whether you pay attention to politics.

If you know anything basic about economics you must have realized that the Obama administration’s stimulus plan has saved our economy from another depression.

But the success of the plan should come as no surprise, as it was backed by Ben Bernanke, the chairman of the Federal Reserve and the foremost expert on the Depression.

But both the Congress and the administration are hesitant to dish out cash for a second time. The economy is growing again, at about 3.5 percent, but according to economist Paul Krugman, it would take about another decade to get employment back to “pre-economic free fall” levels.

Advocating for more action from the government will probably lead to accusations of me being a socialist. But others, I know, are legitimately concerned about the nation’s huge debt and the burden it has become for our children to pay off.

Most conservatives believe that the private industry can get us out of any situation. I can already hear the impassioned speeches about how American innovation will get us out of this mess.

But that’s just not possible. And the claim that private industry is always the answer is just not true. Remember, the financial crisis was a result of too much trust in the private sector.

American car companies are a perfect example of how having the government give you a small boost does have some positive results. American cars have finally started to look good and compete against imports.

The stimulus has done what it was supposed to and ideally, we would now rely on the private sector to pick up the slack. But this doesn’t seem likely. In fact, many big investment firms are shorting the markets and betting on there being a market pull back.

The government should do more. I am not advocating that the government should take over more businesses or that we should now become some kind of semi-socialist nation, I simply want more job creation.

That’s what it boils down to. We need more jobs and they will not be coming any time soon. Spurring job creation will take care of the rest of our problems.

It’s a simple Econ 101 exercise: more jobs means more consumers, more consumers means more money for businesses which leads to businesses selling more products spurring demand for more supplies; and increased investment and consumption which leads to a robust economy. The new stimulus should only be aimed to projects that build more consumers directly.

There are many new infrastructure projects that can be supported. Infrastructure in America has gotten old and needs revamping. Having people build new bridges or even upgrade all of our trains in the east coast could provide much-needed jobs.

The government should also give more low-interest loans to businesses so they can expand and keep people on their payroll.
Economic growth functions like a seed: you don’t just ignore it when it sprouts and leave it to the elements. You need to let it grow a bit stronger and keep a close eye on it. Protect it from storms and other hazards that threaten to kill it until it has grown strong enough to survive on its own.

This is not the time to be weak in resolve. The government has an obligation to keep the economy growing steadily for the sake of those future generations.

College students know better than anyone else that our future won’t be bright if people are not hiring.

We seem ready to spend trillions on funding unpopular wars. But when it comes to helping businesses grow and prosper, which would help better millions of lives here at home, we sit around and wait for the invisible hand to do its magic.

Save and share:
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • Print this article!
  • Digg
  • NewsVine
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • YahooMyWeb

Comments

One Response to “More stimulus money is needed”

  1. David on November 7th, 2009 2:00 am

    Hi Afan,

    I don’t agree that the stimulus of either Bush nor Obama helped save us from going into a depression. Without it, I believe that we would be about where we currently are or maybe a little bit worse but not much. I am glad that they acted but it could have been done in better and in more specific ways, such as:
    - backing low interest loans for small businesses (something you mentioned),
    - fixing the housing glut with tax incentives and loan modification programs that actually work (Obama’s program only covers up to 125% (originally 105%) home’s value which is not enough especially in hard hit areas like Nevada, California, Arizona, Florida, etc.),
    - instituting a loan modification program for commercial properties,
    - giving tax cuts to individuals and businesses giving them more money every month (this was done but I believe it was done badly)
    - Adjusting tax law to allow businesses to spread their losses back up to 5 years and forward for a few years
    - lowering the capital gains rate and corporate tax rates to allow businesses to keep more of their money (have this tied somehow so it incentivizes them to not lay off their workers)
    - decreasing overall government expenses but increasing unemployment benefits and others to help people get back on their feet.
    Those are a few of the things I would have done to make the government’s action more effective and more focused on jobs. I would have also made sure that it was put into the market quickly.

    I believe that most of the 1.4 trillion added to the deficit this year will end up hurting us more than helping us. Once you add that to next year’s which is supposed to be as big or bigger, we are going to be in a world of hurt.

    The cause of the financial crisis was partly to blame on the government and partly on business and partly on the consumer. Government fell asleep at the wheel and didn’t do enough to stop our economy from getting too hot in 2002-2005. Businesses seeing that the government was busy fighting two wars took advantage and placed some stupid bets. Consumers as well made a lot of stupid bets. So saying that it was all the fault of business seems like you are looking for a scapegoat.

    About 1 trillion dollars have been spent on the Afghanistan and Iraq wars since they began (less that Obama added to the deficit this year alone). I would like to remind you that these wars were initially and for years thereafter were popular but we, Americans, don’t do well with long wars and almost always change our minds after just a few years.

    About the American car companies example, actually only Ford (the company that didn’t take money) is competitive with the foreign car makers. GM and Chrysler both continue to lose market share. Also the cash for clunkers is only a temporary bump in sales and you will see car sales go down a bunch when they are reported in the fourth quarter. http://online.wsj.com/mdc/public/page/2_3022-autosales.html

    Finally, I agree with you that the government needs to take more action on the economy to spur job growth but as Obama hasn’t really dealt with the economy since March, I’m not holding my breath waiting on that.

Feel free to leave a comment.
Comments must show respect for the writers and editors of The Rebel Yell as well as other comment posters. Do not post personal information or maliciously attack anybody using the comment system. Offending comments will be deleted. The Rebel Yell is not responsible for the content of links to external Web sites. Comments will not be considered for Letters to the Editor unless submitted here.





Bottom