More stimulus money is needed

More governmental intervention is needed to battle unemployment

I do not care who you are or whether you pay attention to politics.

If you know anything basic about economics you must have realized that the Obama administration’s stimulus plan has saved our economy from another depression.

But the success of the plan should come as no surprise, as it was backed by Ben Bernanke, the chairman of the Federal Reserve and the foremost expert on the Depression.

But both the Congress and the administration are hesitant to dish out cash for a second time. The economy is growing again, at about 3.5 percent, but according to economist Paul Krugman, it would take about another decade to get employment back to “pre-economic free fall” levels.

Advocating for more action from the government will probably lead to accusations of me being a socialist. But others, I know, are legitimately concerned about the nation’s huge debt and the burden it has become for our children to pay off.

Most conservatives believe that the private industry can get us out of any situation. I can already hear the impassioned speeches about how American innovation will get us out of this mess.

But that’s just not possible. And the claim that private industry is always the answer is just not true. Remember, the financial crisis was a result of too much trust in the private sector.

American car companies are a perfect example of how having the government give you a small boost does have some positive results. American cars have finally started to look good and compete against imports.

The stimulus has done what it was supposed to and ideally, we would now rely on the private sector to pick up the slack. But this doesn’t seem likely. In fact, many big investment firms are shorting the markets and betting on there being a market pull back.

The government should do more. I am not advocating that the government should take over more businesses or that we should now become some kind of semi-socialist nation, I simply want more job creation.

That’s what it boils down to. We need more jobs and they will not be coming any time soon. Spurring job creation will take care of the rest of our problems.

It’s a simple Econ 101 exercise: more jobs means more consumers, more consumers means more money for businesses which leads to businesses selling more products spurring demand for more supplies; and increased investment and consumption which leads to a robust economy. The new stimulus should only be aimed to projects that build more consumers directly.

There are many new infrastructure projects that can be supported. Infrastructure in America has gotten old and needs revamping. Having people build new bridges or even upgrade all of our trains in the east coast could provide much-needed jobs.

The government should also give more low-interest loans to businesses so they can expand and keep people on their payroll.
Economic growth functions like a seed: you don’t just ignore it when it sprouts and leave it to the elements. You need to let it grow a bit stronger and keep a close eye on it. Protect it from storms and other hazards that threaten to kill it until it has grown strong enough to survive on its own.

This is not the time to be weak in resolve. The government has an obligation to keep the economy growing steadily for the sake of those future generations.

College students know better than anyone else that our future won’t be bright if people are not hiring.

We seem ready to spend trillions on funding unpopular wars. But when it comes to helping businesses grow and prosper, which would help better millions of lives here at home, we sit around and wait for the invisible hand to do its magic.

Bail out or back off?

Brookings Institute lecturer talks fiscal policy Read more

Restructuring not enough for General Motors

Unions, contracts, useless brands keep GM unprofitable Read more

Pay attention G-20, the not-so developing world is close and nipping at your heels

Shrinking global economy gives room to growing powerhouses Read more

G-20: Solutions will not come without support from Third World

The G-20 summit is beginning to resemble an operatic show more apt for a Friday night showing than a solution-granting gathering.

Read more

Will this be the end of capitalism?

Protests in Europe remind of grave challenges to ideology Read more

Club offers stimulus for students

Economics majors offer peers relief, advice on recession Read more

Capitalism must swallow the pill of recovery

Intervention bruises free markets but it doesn’t destroy them Read more

No bailout needed for booze, alcohol is recession-proof

What do people do for fun during a recession? They certainly aren’t buying cars and eating out. The Starbucks lines are shorter, the craps tables are empty and there has been a reported decrease in sexual activity. One thing that hasn’t decreased, as any bar-going drunkard can attest to, is alcohol consumption.

Read more

Latin American politics important to U.S.

Ignoring Central, South America will prove detrimental Read more

Next Page »